Saturday, October 18, 2025

A Worldly View Parts 1-3 of a Series

 1 FOLLOW ME OUT OF THE WOODS

  

I lie awake many nights, tossing and turning over what can be done to correct America’s deep fall into a land of autocracy, bigotry, and hate. The easiest path is for many people to awaken to their big mistake, having swallowed right-wing propaganda. That is how many people describe it, “right wing.” I want to begin this treatise by clarifying the meaning of labels that are used to divide Americans. The intent of our nation is “E pluribus unum.” Out of many we are one.

 

The trouble begins when many American citizens probably have less knowledge about their government than new immigrants who must pass a test on such knowledge to gain citizenship.

 

I asked AI for an overview to determine the accuracy of my personal notion. I stand, partly corrected:

 

“No, the data does not support that new immigrant citizens consistently know more about the US government than the general citizen population; however, naturalized citizens must pass a civics test to become citizens, which requires a baseline level of knowledge. Some studies suggest native-born citizens may be more informed about history and government, but many native-born citizens lack basic knowledge about the government, according to sources like the Annenberg Public Policy Center.”

 

I asked for an AI Overview of “right wing,” and here is what it says:

 

“While its meaning has evolved, core characteristics of right-wing thought today include: 

·       Conservatism: A preference for preserving existing institutions and traditions. This can include social conservatives who emphasize traditional family values and social order, and fiscal conservatives who focus on limiting government spending and influence.

·       Economic Liberalism: Often champions laissez-faire capitalism, free markets, and deregulation.

·       Limited Government: Advocates for reduced government intervention in the economy and individual lives, prioritizing personal freedom and responsibility.

·       Strong National Defense: Commonly supports a powerful military and a firm approach to law enforcement.

·       Social Hierarchy: Some right-wing ideologies view social or economic inequality as natural and inevitable, or even beneficial to society. 

 

Next, I asked for an AI Overview of “Liberalism.”

“Liberalism is a political and economic philosophy emphasizing individual autonomy, equality of opportunity, and the protection of individual rights. It has been a dominant force in Western democracy since the Age of Enlightenment, although its meaning and application have evolved significantly over time. 

 


 

Core principles

 

Though they vary depending on the specific form of liberalism, several key principles are fundamental to the ideology: 

·       Individualism: Liberalism views the individual as the fundamental building block of a just political system. It promotes individual freedom, reason, and self-determination.

·       Liberty: Central to liberalism is the protection of individual liberties such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of association.

·       Consent of the governed: This principle holds that a government's legitimacy comes from the people it governs, who consent to be ruled.

·       Rule of law: The idea that all individuals and institutions, including the government, are subject to and accountable under the law.

·       Equality: Historically, early liberal thinkers focused on equality before the law. Modern liberalism often extends this to include equality of opportunity and social justice.

·       Limited government: Liberalism supports a constitutional government with a limited scope of power to protect individual rights and freedoms.

·       Private property: The right to own and control private property is a core principle, especially within classical and economic liberalism.”

 I ask you, are these ideas mutually exclusive?  One principle that is shared between these ideas is “Limited government.” That is, both acknowledge the need for governance with the caveat that government must be regulated, as it is also the source of regulation. Until the Donald J. Trump regime, the rule of law was highly respected and integral to the US Constitutional Law of the land. This author rejects the Trump/MAGA movement’s upheaval.   The way ahead is to reestablish and reinvigorate America’s embrace of the rule of law and the founding articles. I go one step further by imploring citizens to dedicate time and attention to renewing their knowledge about government and citizens’ responsibilities to preserve, protect, and defend their Constitutional democratic republic. You see, it isn’t only elected officials who are sworn to the nation’s defense; it includes every able-bodied American.

  

 

2 CELEBRATING ‘NO KINGS’ DAY

 

 

In light of America’s founding by those who vehemently rejected the notion of the nation having a King instead of an elected President, today’s chapter happens when millions of Americans march and shout, no to the dictatorial authoritarian Donald J. Trump and his ilk. Seventy-two percent of Americans want Trump and his cabinet and Congressional tribe out of office. We the People want them gone today, not tomorrow or some day in the future.

 

The damage done by the Trump-Republican MAGA movement is too great to tolerate. One could hope a posse of Generals would arrest him and them at the direction of Congress and with the backing of the Supreme Court. Because Congress and the Court are corrupted by the Trump tribe, the rule of law and due process is bent, altered, and therefore, creative patriots must forge a new way forward.

 

To what outcome is desired and required?

 

The US Government must be purged of the Trump-MAGA-GOP strain. That strain of corruption, undermining the rule of law, cannot coexist in the American democratic republic under the US Constitution. 

 

The mechanism for the purge needs to be defined as it is a process for paving the way for a newly elected government.

 

Impeding the way ahead is a lack of Standards for American Political Parties. 

 

 

Figure 1 Standards for American Political Parties, James A. George

https://www.amazon.com/Standards-American-Political-Parties-George-ebook/dp/B0CXML7MLR

Not to worry, I explored the need for uniform standards for political parties to which all parties and American citizens must adhere and enforce. Basically, standards govern political parties that are non-profit corporations intended to recruit and vet candidates for elected officers bearing their brand. I advocate that political parties be held liable for candidates' truthfulness in their resumes and in their intentions to support party platforms via their individual manifestos. Only when such standards are adopted with implications for a Constitutional Amendment can the public be assured of a degree of honesty and character among them. 

 

 

3 THE PURGE

 

 

I have no expectation that Americans will do their remedial education. However, I began long ago, advocating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights because I believe that document, to which America is a signatory, is a superset of the US Constitution.  Otherwise, human rights are essential to all the rest.

 

To eradicate the evil-bearing administration demands quicker attention than the normal political process. Since Trump himself proffers the notion of his running for a third term (which is illegal) and since he has taken numerous illicit actions for which the court has ruled against him 93 percent of the time, it must be acceptable to counter his subversive actions.

 

“One recent impeachable offense was Trump’s mobilization of military forces into the streets of Los Angeles, in which he trampled on the US Constitution, the rights of peaceful protesters, the constitutional authority of the state of California, and the rule of law.” [1]


 

Trump’s apparent strategy is to flood the zone with lawsuits, many of which are frivolous, with the intention of tying the hands of his opposition. 

 

Since Republican Congressional representatives chose to sit out their responsibilities and not show up at work, the Democratic Representatives should call Congress to order with their leader, Hakeem Jeffries. The first order of business should be to impeach or censor all Republican representatives for dereliction of duty and failing their oaths of office. Denying them the right to vote would place Democrats in charge, and they can advance their leader back to the position of Speaker of the House.

 

Having restored the House, they can advance the budget bill and prepare it for presentation to the Senate. There will be wrangling in the Senate, though, and with momentum, the government should be turned on again.

 

Concurrently, the newly activated Congress can proceed to impeach Donald J. Trump and his “kingdom” expeditiously. Speedy justice is what they deserve. Prosecute and lock them up on all counts. Send Trump to the Court where his cases are on hold and turn them back on to get him in jail. 

 

Where there will surely be resistance, Congress must communicate with both the Supreme Court and the Military leadership about the plan to arrest and remove them. Since the Supreme Court was corrupted by the impeached president’s appointments, those justices must be asked to resign or otherwise be removed. In such cases of Clarence Thomas he may be liable for individual prosecution. 

 

The Purge Process demands special attention and resources independent from the work required to serve the nation’s needs.



[1] https://freespeechforpeople.org/constitutional-scholars-agree-trump-has-committed-multiple-impeachable-offenses/




Monday, October 13, 2025

Trump and Republicans Don’t Get It

Under our Constitutional Democratic Republic, We the People, are equal and independent of our wealth and other status.

Ours is a nation of liberty where there is no King and no authoritarian leadership. That is how we want it.

 

Trump and Republicans have hijacked Americans, fooled them a couple of times. Now, the jig is up.

 

No matter how Trump kowtows and parades his arrogance on the world stage, We the People own America and will hold him and his ilk accountable.



Image: Investopedia 








Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Justice is Completely Corrupted

If you had the opportunity to see and hear AG Bondi answering questions and providing her testimony under oath today by US Senators, you would have witnessed several things:

 

1.     Bondi’s loyalty to the President is above her loyalty to the Nation and the law.

2.     Republican Senators used her presence to continue to charge the Biden administration with abuses.

3.     Democratic Senators asked for answers to specific questions about direction she receives from the President and about a host of issues about the release of information to the public, the Epstein case, and others. 

 

Bondi stonewalled most of it and was willing to go along with Republican Senators who continue to prosecute Biden, who is long gone.

 

Bondi supports the President’s actions to deploy the National Guard wherever he wants. She supports the declaration of drug smugglers as terrorists.

 

The Courts have found the President’s actions on many counts are illegal as the appeals mount toward the Supreme Court. 

 

“Lower courts vs. Supreme Court

 

Lower courts: Data from organizations that track litigation against the executive branch shows that the Trump administration has historically lost a majority of challenges to its agency actions. 

 

For example, studies by the Institute for Policy Integrity found that during his first administration, the Trump administration lost against challenges to its agency actions at a much higher rate than previous administrations.

 

A May 2025 analysis by Democracy Docket noted that the Trump administration lost 96% of federal district court rulings in that month alone, with losses across the political spectrum of judges. 

 

Supreme Court: The Trump administration has historically fared better at the Supreme Court, though analyses of his success here also differ based on the cases being counted. 

 

According to a study cited by the ABA Journal in January 2024, Trump had the worst Supreme Court record of any modern president during his first term, winning only 47% of cases compared to his predecessors' average of two-thirds.

 

However, other analyses have focused on specific types of cases, such as those that were fast-tracked or sent directly to the Supreme Court on an emergency basis. For example, The Christian Science Monitor reported in October 2025 that the Supreme Court had sided with the Trump administration approximately 80% of the time, in contrast to his much higher loss rate in lower federal courts.”




Friday, October 3, 2025

Before the Coup

 

American Politics

Before the Coup

James A. George 

Presidential Failure

·    The 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution addresses presidential succession and disability. Ratified in 1967 after the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, it clarifies what happens if the president dies, resigns, is removed, or becomes unable to perform their duties. 

In the event of President Trump’s inability to perform his duties, Vice President Vance is his successor with the caveat that Vance can perform his oath of office and is not also corrupted. 

What makes President Trump unable to perform his duties? The process by which to make this determination is impeachment, in the absence of debilitating medical conditions or death.

Herein lies a complication because one of the possible charges against President Trump is his attack on the US Constitution and the rule of law. It includes Trump’s series of court-determined illegal actions as well as his overt attack on American cities and citizens, including the misuse of the American military. Those things are evident to the public, and a tally of them will be part of the impeachment document as evidence.

A barrier to justice is the Republican Congress in the House and Senate, which is complicit in collaborating with the President in undermining their oaths and allegiance to preserve and protect our American freedoms. This means that the legal process and rule of law are corrupted, and actions are necessary to bypass the corruption. In fact, many, if not all, of the Republican officials will be named in the suit.  

The US Supreme Court would have to make determinations to support the litigation, except that some members of the court were appointed by Trump, and they, too, are complicit. 

Congressional Correction

Until the voters change Congressional political representation and leadership, there is no path forward to impeaching and prosecuting those who have committed egregious crimes against our nation. 

If the citizens chose Democratic representation in the House and Senate, then impeachment and prosecution can go forward.

This will be complicated by the Vice President seeking to retain the position of President. More action will be required to make the case that J. D. Vance is also unfit.

If there is resistance, the obstruction might rise to the point of military intervention, which would be a coup.

The scenario and way forward are incredibly chaotic and unstable. Needed is patriotic motivation to strike a chord among Republicans.







Saturday, August 16, 2025

Can Ukraine defeat Russia in Crimea?

I asked ChatBGT if Ukraine can defeat Russia in Crimea. Here is the AI answer. Using AI can be a trusted source if the user can verify and validate the answer.

"That’s a big and very complex question. Whether Ukraine can defeat Russia in Crimea depends on what “defeat” means—military liberation, political control, or forcing Russia to withdraw. Let me break it down:

1. Military Realities

  • Russia’s Position: Crimea is heavily fortified. Russia has built multiple defensive lines (trenches, minefields, fortifications), deployed advanced air defenses (S-400 systems), and stationed a large naval presence in Sevastopol. It also treats Crimea as strategically vital—both militarily (the Black Sea Fleet, a logistics hub) and symbolically.

  • Ukraine’s Capabilities: Ukraine has had successes striking deep into Crimea with drones, missiles (like Storm Shadow/SCALP), and sabotage operations. It has damaged parts of the Black Sea Fleet and disrupted logistics via the Kerch Bridge and land routes. However, a full-scale amphibious or land assault would be extraordinarily costly without overwhelming Western-supplied long-range weapons, airpower, and naval dominance—things Ukraine doesn’t currently have.

2. Political & Strategic Factors

  • For Russia: Losing Crimea would be a massive blow to Putin’s legitimacy. Moscow may escalate militarily, possibly even hinting at nuclear threats, if it sees Crimea at risk.

  • For Ukraine: Crimea is not just territory but a powerful symbol. Retaking it is a stated war goal, though Ukraine also knows this could require a prolonged strategy—military pressure plus diplomatic/economic isolation of Russia.

  • Western Support: Ukraine’s ability to challenge Russia in Crimea depends on continued Western aid (weapons, intelligence, economic support). If aid weakens, so does Ukraine’s leverage.

3. Possible Paths to Defeat Russia in Crimea

  • Military Pressure + Attrition: Continued strikes on infrastructure, supply lines, and the Black Sea Fleet could make Crimea increasingly costly and difficult for Russia to hold.

  • Blockade & Isolation: Cutting off the Kerch Bridge and land corridors could slowly strangle Russian forces in Crimea.

  • Negotiated Withdrawal: Unlikely in the near term, but sustained pressure could one day force Russia into talks where Crimea’s status is contested.


📌 Bottom line:
Ukraine is unlikely to retake Crimea through a rapid, direct military offensive under current conditions. However, it can make Russia’s hold on Crimea weaker and more precarious through long-range strikes, sabotage, and attrition. Whether that eventually leads to “defeat” in Crimea depends heavily on Western support, Russian political stability, and how long the war drags on."


Image: AI Overview








Wednesday, August 13, 2025

Trump’s Best Possible Putin Play

Putin and Russia want to take over Ukraine and have tried to do so by military force. Russia has secured some land, including Crimea. Ukraine has held its ground, losing some territory but never giving up the fight. Ukraine received support from NATO allies, including the US.

 

What do Trump and the US have to offer as incentives for Russia to give back certain territory?

 

First, the Russian economy would benefit greatly from the lifting of sanctions on petroleum and other valuable metals exports. Removing specific sanctions would help Europeans and the global market, as oil prices would likely decrease due to increased production.

 

Trump must negotiate on Ukraine’s behalf to regain half of Crimea. He must also push for free, supervised elections in disputed territories where the results would be accepted and not contested.

 

Trump must not give up Ukraine’s right to join NATO. He should support a united European military defense for countries bordering Russia.

 

Economic incentives are what Trump can offer, along with measures to reduce Russia’s costs in continuing the war against Ukraine. 


Image Credit: Axios
https://www.axios.com/2025/08/13/zelensky-trump-putin-summit-ukraine