Monday, February 6, 2017

Dishonest President Trump

Here is what the President gets correctly, terrorism is a real and present danger. The press gets that, and so do most Americans and the free world. 

Eliminating terrorists' threats is a complex job that requires diligence in foreign policy, defense, and homeland security strategy. Everyone understands that too. It is proper for him to remind us to be vigilant as he commands the government to protect us.

What is inappropriate, is lashing out at the free press in the process. That is Trump's tactic, for reasons not fully understood. It is a part of his personal behavior disorder to lash out to cover for his mistakes or policies that people don't universally support.

Trump's accusing others of being "dishonest" is oxymoronic. It is ironic too because his administration has emerged as one of ignoring facts and fabricating information that is tantamount to propaganda.

Blah, blah, blah, says the so-called President Trump.

"Trump: ‘Dishonest press’ won't report terrorist attacks
President Trump on Monday used his first speech to military service members to accuse the news media of refusing to report on terrorist attacks.
Speaking at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla., Trump rattled off a series of strikes carried out by “radical Islamic terrorists,” from the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to recent plots carried out in Paris and Nice, France.

“It’s gotten to a point where it’s not even being reported,” he told a group of senior commanders. “And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn’t want to report it.” 
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/318100-trump-dishonest-press-wont-report-terrorist-attacks
As chicken little taught us, don't cry that the sky is falling too many times, or people may not hear you.




Sunday, February 5, 2017

VP Mike Pence is a co-conspirator

Remember this, VP Mike Pence is a co-conspirator in joining President Trump's attack on a court justice, referring to him as a "so-called judge." Pence can't have it both ways.

When Donald Trump is impeached for violating the emolument clause of the US Constitution and perhaps other violations of the law including sexual assault and failing to uphold his oath of office, Pence is next in line. However, by joining and supporting Trump, that makes him a collaborator and co-conspirator.

The same might be said for the Speaker of the House and any other Republicans who align with Trump's illegalities.

The domino theory will have a new application here.

"Pence Defends Trump ‘Speaking His Mind’ About Federal Judge, Promises ‘All Legal Means’ to Challenge Ruling 
By NICKI ROSSOLL  Feb 4, 2017, 5:02 PM ET" 
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pence-defends-trump-speaking-mind-federal-judge-promises/story?id=45266900&cid=clicksource_4380645_2_three_posts_vert_hed

Yes, a President may speak his mind. The President will also be held accountable for his words.


ABC News Screen Grab

Mike Pence defending Trump's verbal attack on a judge

Saturday, February 4, 2017

Trump charged with violating oath

In the court of public opinion, here and now, this independent journalist and American citizen charge President Donald Trump with assault on the US Constitution and American Political System. By attacking a US judge, he is undermining the judicial branch of the government. In the previous week, he authored and issued an executive order that is determined to be unlawful and worthy of stay for additional review.

In recent history, Trump has attacked other judges, one with a malicious and racist assault.

These actions by Trump are intolerable as they are provocative and intentionally seek to harm a branch of government.

Impeach Donald Trump as he is not worthy of the office. His actions are unAmerican in a multitude of ways.

The charge of emolument statute violation should be enjoined with other charges of malicious behavior by the sitting President.

"Trump attacks 'so-called judge' over travel ban ruling
BY TRISTAN LEJEUNE - 02/04/17 08:33 AM EST  8
Trump attacks 'so-called judge' over travel ban ruling
President Trump on Saturday issued a new defense of his controversial travel and refugee restrictions, defending the “ban” from the “so-called judge” who halted the order on Friday.
Federal Judge James Robart, appointed by former President George W. Bush in 2003, issued an immediate nationwide restraining order against Trump’s action, which had cut off citizens from seven Muslim-majority nations from entering the U.S. Civil liberties groups applauded the ruling, but Trump vowed it would be overturned."
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/317899-trump-attacks-so-called-judge-over-travel-ban-ruling

"Trump has violated his oath to the Constitution 
His first act as President.

CREDIT: Adam Peck/iStock/AP Photo 
On January 20th, 2017, President-elect Trump put his hand on two bibles — one a family bible, and one the same bible that President Lincoln was sworn in for his first term, and that President Obama used — and swore that he would, to the best of his ability, “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
President Trump then promptly broke his word." 
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-constitution-first-day-office-55d1f0668c27#.lsv45pn7i 

Friday, February 3, 2017

War with Iran would be indefensible and unaffordable

Trump might be contemplating war with Iran.

It is 2006, with two years remaining in the George W. Bush administration. The war in Iraq has drained the treasury as has Republican's policy to give wealthy American's ill-advised tax breaks. A clear and present danger then was Iran.

The war in Afghanistan had been on since 2001 with no end in sight.

There is no money for that, and no one in the world wants yet another war in that part of the world.

Meanwhile, Iran was saber rattling and had an aggressive nuclear program. Iran appeared intent on developing nuclear weapons.

"Is War with Iran Inevitable? 
Ivo H. DaalderFriday, April 21, 2006 
There appears to be an emerging consensus in Washington and around the world, that war with Iran is just a matter of time. But is this consensus right? There are good reasons to believe that the Bush administration, while convinced that an Iran capable of producing nuclear weapons represents a major threat to international security, will conclude that military force does not offer a desirable answer. The reason is not that the threat would not warrant the use of military force, but that the military, political, and international context for making such a decision militates against it. 
The Iranian nuclear threat is no doubt more real than the Iraqi nuclear threat in 2003. Whereas the “evidence” of an Iraqi nuclear program hinged on disputed information about yellowcake purchases in Niger and the acquisition of aluminum tubes, Tehran has been quite open about its desire to master the technical process of enriching uranium (which constitutes the most critical step in producing a bomb). This reality has led many people to conclude that if President Bush decided to go to war on the basis of flimsy evidence of an Iraqi nuclear program in 2003, then surely he will go to war on the basis of much more substantial evidence of an Iranian program this time around." 
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/is-war-with-iran-inevitable/

We know what happened. Russia and China would have no tolerance for Americans attacking Iran. Obama's approach was to negotiate containment of the Iran nuclear program in exchange for lifting sanctions.
"Some may still think that bombing Iran will prove easy — but the administration will surely know that successfully preempting Iran’s nuclear program requires the kind of intelligence about target locations that we simply do not have. Iraq, moreover, has demonstrated that counting on an easy aftermath is sheer folly. Iran can retaliate in multiple ways, from making life in Iraq and Afghanistan exceedingly unpleasant to attacking oil shipping in the Gulf and the Straights of Hormuz and even launching terrorist strikes against American forces, American interests, and even against its people at home. Attacking Iran’s nuclear program would be no more a cakewalk than was the liberation of Iraq." 
https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/is-war-with-iran-inevitable/

Today, American military professionals know that war with Iran would be catastrophic on many levels. It would be a human tragedy from which Americans may never recover, economically nor politically.

President Trump and his inner circle appear hell-bent to provoke a war with Iran.

"On Wednesday, the White House put out a statement from National Security Advisor Michael Flynn criticizing Iran’s recent ballistic missile test as well as a number of attacks in recent months by Iranian-supported Houthi militias against American, Saudi, and Emirati ships off the coast of Yemen. The statement then criticizes the Iran nuclear deal and the Obama administration, before concluding that “we are officially putting Iran on notice.” 
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/02/02/is-trump-trying-to-tweet-us-into-a-war-with-iran/
If there is war with Iran, there will be a draft and many American soldiers will be in the fight. Many thousands will die. Are you ready for that?


Image from Foreign Policy article


Thursday, February 2, 2017

Moving beyond the present crisis

The present situation is on the verge of a "Constitutional crisis." Maybe we can't skip over it, but we can improve our understanding.

A constitutional crisis is a situation which a legal system's constitution or another basic principle of operation appears unable to resolve; it often results in a breakdown in the orderly operation of government.

The segment of the US population that voted for President Trump and the Republican Congress might approve of the administration's initial salvo of appointments and executive orders.

According to the Gallup Poll on January 13th:

  • More Americans disapprove (51%) than approve (44%) of Trump's transition
  • His transition approval fell most among political independents
  • Majority consider Cabinet picks "average" or better, but 44% rate them as subpar


He is not off to a good start. Consider the job model for a President of the United States.

"As chief executive officer of the U. S. Government Enterprise, a president has certain management discretions and responsibilities:  
•    Design of the service delivery processes and systems to carry out Congressionally enacted laws and regulations that have been approved by the President  
•    Staff the organizations that enable the service delivery processes  
•    Equip the organizations and service delivery systems with needed state of the art technologies  
•    Guide service delivery system performance with plans and programs that include performance metrics  
•    Propose new laws and regulations  
•    Propose changes in laws and regulations that includes scrapping obsolete provisions  
The U. S. Government Enterprise is organized by departments and agencies as a means of compartmentalizing the expertise that is aligned with providing four primary outputs:  
1.    Domestic tranquility provided
2.    Common defense provided
3.    General welfare provided
4.    Liberty secured 
The Commander-in-chief is the top executive and is also the top expert in Constitutional law about which the incumbent is the leading executive implementer and often the author of the new and amended legislation.  
Task 1: Planning, staffing, organizing, and scheduling Presidential work and government functions 
Subtask 1.1: Recruit and staff the cabinet and department and agency appointments
Subtask 1.2: Conduct cabinet meetings to develop and implement strategies and policies for accomplishing the nation’s workload and issues
Subtask 1.3: Define the nation’s outcomes and priorities for each major department and agency to produce the nation’s strategic plan

Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and reconcile with Congress 
Subtask 2.1: Assume responsibility for the legacy agenda and make adjustments to align with the President’s management agenda or equivalent
Subtask 2.2: Work with cabinet heads to develop performance plans and schedules
Subtask 2.3: Work with Congressional leadership and collaborate to implement the nation’s strategy, plans, and programs  
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation 
Subtask 3.1: Propose bills to Congress
Subtask 3.2: Consult and advise Congress
Subtask 3.3: Collaborate with industry and business leaders in the development of policies and regulations of all kinds
Subtask 3.4: Approve or veto legislation
Subtask 3.5: Request a declaration for war from Congress  
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations 
Subtask 4.1: Review and evaluate programs that include new acquisitions and on-going operations
Subtask 4.2: Evaluate programs including legacy processes and engineer new ones for accomplishing and producing required and promised outcomes
Subtask 4.3: Continuously improve  
Task 5: Report progress and discuss issues with the American public to keep them informed  
Task 6: Meet with heads of state and participate in international meetings and conferences for heads of state 
Subtask 6.1: Participate in international economic conferences
Subtask 6.2: Respond to international crises and requests for assistance
Subtask 6.3: Promote democratic process and reforms."
https://www.amazon.com/Select-American-President-James-George/dp/1480840882/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1486047665&sr=1-1&keywords=how+to+select+an+american+president



Coping with the American situation

What is the "American situation" as it stands? Here is an attempt at an objective case analysis. I invite all points of view to be considered for discussion because as I have characterized it before, this could be a "mayday" moment for the nation.

Before Election 2016

America had two four-year terms of the Obama administration during which a majority of voters backed the President while the same citizens supported a Republican majority in the House and a slim Democratic majority in the Senate. Obama's presidency with Congress resulted in a dysfunctional government.

The economy rebounded from calamity and near collapse during the Obama administration. However, it did not generate sufficient growth and upward mobile opportunities leaving some lower-skilled workers behind in addition to depriving millennial workers their share of the available work.

Employment data does not reflect the quality-of-work problem. Citizens are uncertain about the numbers of persons who have given up trying to find a job, for instance.

Too many people feel disenfranchised and left out of the system. Where many formerly believed that they were represented by the Democratic Party and supporting institutions, they found a new voice in Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. Those two offered opposite alternatives.

When the Democratic Party chose Hillary Clinton as their nominee, many voters saw too many detractors. Some did not vote. Many chose the Republican candidate, Donald Trump who won the Electoral Vote while losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.

The nation is divided now with large population centers on both coasts supporting the Democratic Party and being opposed to Donald Trump. Americans in the more rural parts of the country aligned with the new President and Republicans.

Republican representatives earned support from citizens at the state and local government level throughout the nation.

After Election 2016

The Trump administration is only weeks old. The cabinet posts by Donald Trump include a profile of very wealthy persons who are radically right-wing in their ideologies. They are aligned with the President. Many cabinet nominees have no experience in managing large bureaucratic organizations. Some are sworn by their beliefs to dismantle or cut the organizations for which they are responsible.

President Trump's behavior that was evident throughout his campaign is consistently present and visible now that he is the commander-in-chief. The President is brash and bold to some, or reckless and feckless to others.

The world that includes allies is reacting negatively to the President's actions and executive orders, especially on immigration and foreign policy. The technology sector executives are registering opposition, and the President is combative with industry in general while lobbying for more American jobs. The conflicts in positions are his way to negotiate, he says.

The President's personal legal problems are mounting behind the scenes. He will be facing sexual assault and harassment charges. He has yet to release his IRS filings, and there are reasons to believe that there are problems in there. He is facing an emolument Constitutional case for which the outcome could result in his impeachment.

His executive orders are finding little support in the legal foundation as they will be tested in the court. Some findings have already been made against them. Therein lies a problem. A president that persists in advancing illegal orders might result in charges of failing to uphold his oath of office.

Meanwhile, the Republican-controlled Congress is attempting to move along with business as usual against protests by the Democratic opposition. The Democratic opposition is rallying peaceful citizen protests that are erupting in large population centers.

How is America to cope? That will be the subject of a series of articles here.


http://eecue.com/

Americans boycott





Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Vetting Steve Bannon, Trump's strategist

Let it all hang out.

President Donald Trump employs Steve Bannon as his chief strategist. Trump first engaged him as an advisor such that he did not have to have Senate approval. When Trump reorganized the National Security team and promoted Bannon to a seat at the table, that move requires Senate approval and candidate vetting.

The vetting of persons in high places in government are not just an administrative detail. It is done on behalf of citizens to ensure integrity and security.

Using the same process that I recommend in my book, How to Select an American President by James A. George with James A. Rodger (c) 2017 Archway Publishing, consider Steve Bannon.

Who is Steve Bannon? Look at his resume.

The short version of his resume is on Wiki as shown here. (This article uses information from Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Bannon, as people usually check Wiki for information.

Steve Bannon


  • White House Chief Strategist
  • Incumbent Assumed office
  • January 20, 2017
  • President    Donald Trump
  • Preceded by    Position established
  • Senior Counselor to the President
  • Incumbent Assumed office
  • January 20, 2017
  • Serving with Kellyanne Conway, Dina Powell
  • President    Donald Trump
  • Preceded by    John Podesta (2015)
  • Personal details
  • Born    Stephen Kevin Bannon
  • November 27, 1953 (age 63)
  • Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.
  • Political party    Republican
  • Spouse(s)    Cathleen Houff Jordan (divorced)
  • Mary Piccard (1995–1997)
  • Diane Clohesy (divorced 2009)
  • Education    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (BA)
  • Georgetown University (MA)
  • Harvard University (MBA)
  • Military service
  • Allegiance United States
  • Service/branch United States Navy
  • Years of service 1976–1983


When I first reviewed it awhile ago, two strengths are apparent: Academic achievement and Military Service. He is intelligent and has demonstrated allegiance to the nation through military service.

Because his employment by the President is at such a high level, much due diligence is appropriate.

Raised in a working-class family, Irish-Catholic, and pro-Kennedy, he graduated from Virginia Tech in 1976 with a bachelor's degree in urban planning and holds a master's degree in National Security Studies from Georgetown University School of Foreign Service. In 1985, Bannon received a Master of Business Administration degree with honors from Harvard Business School. This background is relevant and honorable.

Bannon was an officer in the United States Navy for seven years in the late 1970s and early 1980s, serving on the destroyer USS Paul F. Foster as a Surface Warfare Officer in the Pacific Fleet and stateside as a special assistant to the Chief of Naval Operations at the Pentagon.

Having military service of this type and level is highly-valued for persons in the executive branch of government.

Now, consider what Steve Bannon did upon leaving the US Navy.

After his military service, Bannon worked at Goldman Sachs as an investment banker in the Mergers and Acquisitions Department. In 1990, Bannon and several colleagues from Goldman Sachs launched Bannon & Co., a boutique investment bank specializing in media. Through Bannon & Co., Bannon negotiated the sale of Castle Rock Entertainment to Ted Turner. As payment, Bannon & Co. accepted a financial stake in five television shows, including Seinfeld. Société Générale purchased Bannon & Co. in 1998.

Now, Steve is on the money with successful investments.

He engaged in environmental research. In 1993, while still managing Bannon & Co., Bannon was made the acting director of the Earth-science research project Biosphere 2 in Oracle, Arizona. Under Bannon, the project shifted emphasis from researching space exploration and colonization toward pollution and global warming. He left the project in 1995.

He was successful in the film industry. In the 1990s, Bannon became an executive producer in the Hollywood film and media industry.

He next transitioned from entertainment to politics.

Bannon persuaded Goldman Sachs to invest, in 2006, in a company known as Internet Gaming Entertainment.[38] Following a lawsuit, the company rebranded as Affinity Media and Bannon took over as CEO. From 2007 through 2011, Bannon was the chair and CEO of Affinity Media. During this time, Bannon spoke at the Liberty Restoration Foundation Orlando Florida on the Economic Crisis of 2008, the potential impact on Medicare and Medicaid and his 2010 film Generation Zero.

Bannon was executive chair and co-founder of the Government Accountability Institute, a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization, where he helped orchestrate the publication of the book Clinton Cash, from its founding in 2012 until he left in August 2016. For the years 2012 through 2015, he received between $81,000 and $100,000 each year; the organization reported that he worked an average of 30 hours per week for the organization.

In 2015, Bannon was ranked No. 19 on Mediaite's list of the "25 Most Influential in Political News Media 2015".

Bannon also hosted a radio show (Breitbart News Daily) on the SiriusXM Patriot satellite radio channel.

His ventures turned to the far right. Bannon was a founding member of the board of Breitbart News, a far-right news, opinion and commentary website which, according to Philip Elliott and Zeke J. Miller of Time, has "pushed racist, sexist, xenophobic and anti-Semitic material into the vein of the alternative right."

In March 2012, after founder Andrew Breitbart's death, Bannon became executive chair of Breitbart News LLC, the parent company of Breitbart News.

Is Breitbart a primary source of "fake news?"

Fake news websites deliberately publish hoaxes, propaganda, and disinformation to drive web traffic inflamed by social media. These sites are distinguished from news satire as fake news articles are usually fabricated to deliberately mislead readers, and profit through clickbait.

The New York Times noted in a December 2016 article that fake news had previously maintained a presence on the Internet and within tabloid journalism in years before the 2016 U.S. election. Before the election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, fake news had not impacted the election process to such a high degree. After the 2016 election, the issue of fake news turned into a political weapon between supporters of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump; due to these back-and-forth complaints, the definition of fake news as used for such polemics became vaguer.

The answer about Breitbart that I found from another analyst is this.
"On the one hand, Breitbart News Network focuses on stories that denigrate Islam, promote far-right political candidates and attempt to portray left-wing political figures in a poor light. So its viewpoint is fairly clear. 
On the other hand, it’s never pretended to be anything other than a publication designed for an ultraconservative readership, so I give it points for honesty, at least. 
As a reader, I’m not too concerned about whether it (or any publication) is biased. Anything written or produced by humans has a viewpoint. I’m more concerned with knowing what that viewpoint is, so I can take it into account as I read."  
Journalist Andrew Smith

A different and more critical assessment is offered by Mother Jones and NPR.

"They're smarter than your average racist. NPR explains further: 
The views of the alt-right are widely seen as anti-Semitic and white supremacist....Most of its members are young white men who see themselves first and foremost as champions of their own demographic. However, apart from their allegiance to their "tribe," as they call it, their greatest points of unity lie in what they are against multiculturalism, immigration, feminism and, above all, political correctness. 
"They see political correctness really as the greatest threat to their liberty," Nicole Hemmer, University of Virginia professor and author of a forthcoming book Messengers of the Right, explained on Morning Edition. "So, they believe saying racist or anti-Semitic things — it's is not an act of hate, but an act of freedom," she said.
Being racist is "an act of freedom"! Ben Shapiro, a conservative who used to work for Bannon, said this: 
Under Bannon’s Leadership, Breitbart Openly Embraced The White Supremacist Alt-Right. Andrew Breitbart despised racism. Truly despised it. He used to brag regularly about helping to integrate his fraternity at Tulane University. He insisted that racial stories be treated with special care to avoid even the whiff of racism. With Bannon embracing Trump, all that changed. Now Breitbart has become the alt-right go-to website, with [Milo] Yiannopoulos pushing white ethnonationalism as a legitimate response to political correctness, and the comment section turning into a cesspool for white supremacist meme makers." 
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/11/steve-bannon-racist-lets-find-out
The Senate should interrogate Steve Bannon about his views.


Right-wing extremist