Political Engineering:
A
Good American President
James A. George, Author
and Independent Journalist, Cincinnati, Ohio
James A. Rodger, Indiana
University, PA, USA
Abstract
This chapter describes political engineering at an
atomic level. That is, addressing what makes a competent elected official and
using the office of president of the United States as an example. The authors
published a series of books and associated papers that presented the overall
construct in applying systems engineering and information technology to
improving government systems and performance. Here is a demonstration in
applying concepts to help citizen-voters strengthen their ability to analyze
and evaluate the candidate and incumbent performance with a standard approach and
criteria.
Since
political parties have a responsibility in vetting candidates bearing their
brand, the authors encourage political leaders to focus on improving their
process because citizens depend on them for candidate quality and integrity.
Being a part of pluralistic democracy is a serious responsibility that requires
continuous improvement.
Keywords: WORD-SENSE DISAMBIGUATION
(WSD), FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS, GROUP KNOWLEDGE MODEL, PRESIDENT’S JOB MODEL, POLITICAL
ENGINEERING, OUTCOMES, PLURALISTIC DEMOCRACY
INTRODUCTION
This paper addresses the meaning of a “good American President,” as an
instance of word-sense disambiguation (WSD). What is the meaning of “good” in
this use?
Defining the context
The authors suggest that the highest order purpose of government is
striving to create an ideal environment in which citizens and their commercial
businesses can thrive and optimize in a global economy. In a democratic
republic such as the United States, governments collaborate with private
corporations to maximize the return on national resources. The aim is to
develop policies that optimize return on the resources of the nation.
Governments are service-oriented enterprises that attend citizens needs
as prescribed by them through levels of government systems and representation.
Governments are funded by tax revenues and other fees as legislated.
Legislators work with executives to establish plans, programs, services,
budgets, and enabling funding. Governments are expected to balance their
accounts and to be financially sustainable.
Departments and Agencies comprise the Federal government as bureaucratic
entities created by acts of legislation. The federal government also charters a
host of corporations as independent entities. States governments also charter
corporations. Most local, county, and municipal governments are public,
non-profit corporations.
“National resources” include natural resources, raw materials, land, and
capital as primary inputs to a myriad of public and private processes. There
are multiple sources for determining the inventory of national resources.
Processes are all of the systems and activities that constitute the work
required to produce desirable and expected outcomes. They are a product of
legislation and the work of the Federal government organizations.
In the American political system[1],
the US Constitution is the overarching control, a network of laws and
regulations that guide and constrain the processes, including private sector
business rules. Where processes define “how” work is done, people and
technology perform the actual work.
The government systems are staffed by people in government organizations
and contractors to do the work as legislated by Congress. They are “mechanisms” that transform inputs
into value-adding outcomes.
The Executive branch manages government services as a co-equal partner
in the process.
The court system administers justice and resolves disputes.
Citizens and corporations staff private sector processes and systems to
produce products and services offered, delivered, sold, and bought through the
network of market-driven commerce. People and commercial organizations perform
work, where compensation is based on individual’s value-adding contributions.
A nation’s gross domestic product is a way to quantify economic
productivity. Only commercial corporations and entrepreneurs generate products
and services sold in the global marketplace, which create a nation’s
wealth. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP)[2]
is the current measurement method.
Alternatively, Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)[3]
is as a better way to measure performance with respect for economic, social,
and environmental responsibility. In the book, Regenerating America with Sustainable Economics © 2017 Archway
Publishing[4],
the authors argue that capitalism is unsustainable. Suggested is a new model needed
from which to engineer sustainable economies, and the authors call it the
Optimized Sustainment Model (OSM).
“Outcomes” include all of those associated results from government
services delivery and all of those produced by private corporations and
individuals.
Private Sector Outcomes
·
Profit (Capital)
·
Products
·
Services
·
Customer Satisfaction
·
Assets (Intellectual property)
·
Expenses (Cost of doing business)
·
Physical property
·
Jobs/Employment
·
Debt
·
Interest
·
Cash flow
Government (Public Sector)
Outcomes
Throughout the range of presidential tasks, the
President analyzes, evaluates, approves and directs allocation of the
government’s resources to perform work and produce required outcomes. The
executive staffs the bureaucracy with executives by appointment with Senate
confirmation. Only Congress can fund the work of government. Achieving the
highest return on cost is a president’s responsibility.
American citizens have every right to expect the
following outcomes listed in relative priority. The percentage following the
result suggests as what most citizens expect.
1. Human
rights as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights[5] to which the USA is a
signatory supported 100%
2. The US
Constitution and The Bill of Rights guaranteed 100%
3. The
Rule of Law supported 100%
4. Nation
secured economically - 100%
5. Nation
has a sustainable economy - 100%
6. Clean
air and water - 100%
7. Nation
secured militarily - 100%
8. The
best education in the world - #1
9.
Homeland defended from foreign and domestic terrorists - 100%
10.
Employment opportunities for all who can work - 100%
11. Upward
mobility for all who are prepared commensurate with ability - 100%
12. All
persons provided minimal sustainment as a baseline to start - 100%
13. Social
security assured for all persons - 100%
14. The
freest nation in the world - #1
15. The
lowest crime rate in the world - #1 in the least crime per capita
Observe that “human rights” is listed first, and
that is because it is inalienable to every citizen in the world independent
from the form of government or state in which they live.
In common with the Private
Sector Outcomes, these are the Government’s:
·
Revenue from Taxes and Fees
·
Products
·
Services
·
Customer Satisfaction
·
Assets (Intellectual property)
·
Expenses (Cost of service delivery)
·
Physical property
·
Jobs/Employment
·
Debt
·
Interest
·
Cash flow
·
Safety and Security
·
Health
·
Infrastructure
Let’s discuss the outcomes
and their relative priority. America, the nation, is defined by the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. However, those elements
of the American Political System are subordinated to the larger principle of
human rights for every citizen on the planet. That is why this list begins with
“The Universal Declaration,” and that is a teaching point for many citizens
because equality for all starts with those propositions and instruments. The
rule of law, the restriction of the arbitrary exercise of power by
subordinating it to well-defined and established laws, is essential to all the
rest.
A nation must be secured
economically, or else it is unviable and unable to care for citizens as they
expect in a democratic republic. A country must generate sufficient tax revenue
to support its obligations. It must not spend more than it can afford, as
reflected in the debt and deficit.
It is essential that citizens
agree with the purpose of government. The primary purpose of government is to
create an environment in which individuals and their corporations can thrive in
a free-market economy. To what extent do citizens agree with that proposition?
The purpose of government is to optimize return on the nation’s resources in
partnership with citizens and their public and private corporations.
The rule of law applies
internally and externally among trading partners and allies. Without that
protection, there is no financial integrity and security.
Expectations about the
economy have evolved into the concept of sustainable economics as accomplished
by balancing economic, social, and environmental responsibilities. Having a sustainable
economy is dependent on developing and fielding renewable energy systems.
Renewable energy is a national requirement to be accomplished in public and
private partnership as part of the national infrastructure.
Humanity cannot survive and
thrive without clean air and water. While there is a debate about climate
change and environmental science, undeniably, people have spoiled the air and
water to the detriment of their health.
A nation-state must secure
its integrity with military power as long as a rogue, and hostile nations
exist.
Having an education system
that produces superior students and citizens that compete in the global economy
is essential as is providing ample employment opportunity with corresponding
upward mobility.
Impoverishment must be
illegal. That everyone is ensured minimal sustainment as a baseline to start.
Consider this idea in a very
personal manner. What do people need as a matter of necessity at various stages
in their life cycles?
Necessities
In the beginning:
·
All citizens have
affordable healthcare for their lifetime
·
All citizens have
affordable housing, food, and access to essential transportation
·
Parents have work
to perform to earn a living and to attend their obligations
·
Community has
police and fire protection to make the home safe
·
Community has
excellent schools that are accessible to young citizens
·
Geniuses are
provided opportunities to learn at a rate commensurate with their abilities
based on their performance
·
All children are
encouraged to perform to their optimum ability as a matter of personal
responsibility and self-reliance
·
Opportunities are
planned for scaling to the demographics of the emerging population
Upon high school graduation:
·
HS graduates have
access to college to prepare for professions and vocations
·
All graduates, HS
and college have access to work to earn a sustainable living
·
All HS graduates
have access to low interest or no interest education and training loans
Upon college and training
graduation or completion:
·
Graduates have
access to job opportunities commensurate with their abilities
·
Graduates who
seek to become entrepreneurs have access to capital resources commensurate with
their plans and preparation
·
Graduates may
expect government and private enterprise to produce sufficient upward mobility
to support their advancing preparation and development
As working citizens in
professions, occupations, vocations, and jobs:
·
Citizens may
expect the opportunity to save and invest a portion of their earnings to
enhance their well-being
·
Citizens may
expect programs from both the private sector and government to support planned
retirement
·
All citizens may
expect to live a good life in the absence of poverty providing that they commit
to performing to the best of their ability
To what extent do citizens agree that these are necessities? Is a referendum
needed?
What can citizens expect from
their earnest labor and for being responsible citizens? Needed is a system that
ensures exceptional reward and incentives for exceptional performance. Needed
is a system that contains a balance of consequences such that poor performance
is discouraged, or punished. That system needs to be shared throughout society
in both private and government enterprise.
Should that system be a
free-for-all or a natural accidental occurrence such as by invisible hands, or
should it be more deterministic by a visible government that operates by the
hands of We the People?
Being a responsible and
self-reliant citizen who exhibits social and environmental responsibility is a
sustainment position in a healthy economy.
PRESIDENT’S JOB MODEL
To determine what makes a “good president,” one must know the job tasks
for the position of President. The authors applied a job modelling technique
once employed by AT&T to define the presidential tasks. Accomplishing this
required referencing the US Constitution and applying knowledge from having
consulted with the US Federal Government for over twenty-five years.
Task 1: Planning, staffing, organizing,
and scheduling Presidential work and government functions
Subtask 1.1:
Recruit and staff the cabinet and department and agency appointments
Subtask 1.2:
Conduct cabinet meetings to develop and implement strategies and policies for
accomplishing the nation’s workload and issues
Subtask 1.3:
Define the nation’s outcomes and priorities for each major department and
agency to produce the nation’s strategic plan
Task 2: Develop the President’s
management agenda and budget and reconcile with Congress
Subtask 2.1:
Assume responsibility for the legacy agenda and make adjustments to align with
the President’s management agenda or equivalent
Subtask 2.2:
Work with cabinet heads to develop performance plans and schedules
Subtask 2.3:
Work with Congressional leadership and collaborate to implement the nation’s
strategy, plans, and programs
Task 3: Initiate and approve
legislation
Subtask 3.1:
Propose bills to Congress
Subtask 3.2:
Consult and advise Congress
Subtask 3.3:
Collaborate with industry and business leaders in the development of policies
and regulations of all kinds
Subtask 3.4:
Approve or veto legislation
Subtask 3.5:
Request a declaration for war from Congress
Task 4: Implement plans and
manage on-going operations
Subtask 4.1:
Review and evaluate programs that include new acquisitions and on-going
operations
Subtask 4.2:
Evaluate programs including legacy processes and engineer new ones for
accomplishing and producing required and promised outcomes
Subtask 4.3:
Continuously improve
Task 5: Report progress and
discuss issues with the American public to keep them informed
Task 6: Meet with heads of state
and participate in international meetings and conferences for heads of state
Subtask 6.1:
Participate in international economic conferences
Subtask 6.2:
Respond to international crises and requests for assistance
Subtask 6.3:
Promote democratic process and reforms
The Concept of Operations
(CONPS) of the work of the President
The President is the Chief
Executive of the Federal government enterprise and is the Commander in Chief
presiding over all Departments and Agencies as well as the White House Staff.
Primary threads of
responsibility include:
1. Staffing the Executive positions of all Departments
and Agencies subject to Senate approval.
2. Managing Departments and Agencies to ensure the
delivery of government services as prescribed by laws and regulations.
3. Planning and budgeting, establishing priorities
reflected in the President’s management agenda, in concert with Congress.
4. Making and changing policies, including issuing
Executive Orders.
5. Strategizing, predicting, forecasting, decision
making, and sense making
Managerial skills in a
contemporary paradigm include the following:
·
Collaborating and facilitating (aka organizing)
·
Acquisition, logistics, procurement
·
Financing
·
Safety and security
·
Organizations, activities, and
interactions among participants and stakeholders
- Processes for initiating, developing,
maintaining, and retiring the system (laws and regulations)
Candidate and Incumbent
Resume and Certifications
Citizen-voters, political parties, and the media have the responsibility
to vet candidates and incumbents based on their past performance and experience
as aligned with the job model and statutory requirements. The process is a
matter of verifying the resume and claims made, as would anyone seeking
employment. For anyone wanting a job in government service, there are standards
including those for Senior Executive Service, for instance. Why should citizens
expect anything less for the President or any other elected official?
Therefore, the authors derived suggested skill, knowledge, and
experience requirements and presented them in an evaluation matrix. Included
also are considerations for a candidate’s character, mental, and physical
health where board-certified professionals are sought for assessment and certification.
Consideration is given intelligence (IQ) in a similar manner.
Financial and legal integrity are sought just as for any federal employee
requiring a security clearance. Why would not a candidate for elected office,
including the President, not be subject to the same scrutiny as other
government employees?
Table 1. Presidential Candidate Evaluation Matrix
Candidate/Incumbent Name:
Evaluation Criterion
|
Values
|
Score
|
Qualifications
Required by Law: As directed by the Constitution, a presidential candidate must be a natural born citizen of
the United States, a
resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older.
|
1
|
1
|
Home State/Residence: Some might favor a larger state over a smaller
one based on affinity with governing the nation at large. Values range 1-3.
|
1-3
|
|
College Graduate BS/BA
|
1
|
|
GPA: H-2, M-1, L-0
|
0-2
|
|
Academic Honors and Distinctions
|
1
|
|
Post Graduate – Masters
|
2
|
|
PhD
|
3
|
|
Occupation/Vocation
|
|
|
Lawyer
|
3
|
|
CPA
|
2
|
|
Professional i.e. MD
|
2
|
|
Physical Health
|
1-3
|
|
Mental Health
|
0-1
|
|
Intelligence Quotient
|
1-3
|
|
Affected Class (Race, Gender)
|
1-3
|
|
Character
|
0-2
|
|
Leadership
|
1-3
|
|
Continuing Education/Training
|
1
|
|
Knowledge about Government
|
1-3
|
|
Knowledge about the Job
|
1-3
|
|
Relevant Skills
|
1-3
|
|
Life History
|
0-2
|
|
Manifesto/Platform/Agenda
|
1-3
|
|
Relationships
|
1-3
|
|
Political Party Affiliation
|
0-2
|
|
Values
|
1-3
|
|
Military Experience
|
1
|
|
Veteran
|
2
|
|
Officer
|
2
|
|
NCO
|
1
|
|
None
|
0
|
|
Public Office: Vice President
|
5
|
|
Public Office: Judge
|
1
|
|
Public Office: Dept. Secretary
|
3
|
|
Governor
|
4
|
|
US Senator
|
3
|
|
US Member of the House of Representatives
|
3
|
|
Mayor: (Size of municipality matters)
|
1-3
|
|
State Legislator
|
1
|
|
Other Public Office
|
1
|
|
Private Sector CEO/President (Size and nature of
business/industry matters)
|
1-3
|
|
Director/Manager
|
1
|
|
Inventor (Patents)
|
1-2
|
|
Entrepreneur
|
1
|
|
Memberships
|
1
|
|
Religion: Matters, Irrelevant, Private (Stated position)
|
1
|
|
Incumbency
|
0-10
|
|
Possible Score Range (<61-94)
|
61-94
|
|
Citizen-Voters make judgments based on reviewing candidate resumes as
vetted and certified, and based on other information such as a President’s
Manifesto and alignment with Party Platforms. They produce their weighted score
for comparison with other candidates under consideration.
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) is omitted from the criteria, though a
board-certified declaration might be helpful. Additional research is necessary
to support this topic.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
1.
Demonstrate how to define what makes a Presidential
candidate or incumbent a good one.
2.
Describe the necessity for political parties and other
third-party organizations to help voters vet candidates.
3.
Discuss the nature of competence and character in
evaluating prospective candidates and incumbents.
Background
The authors have researched
the subject of evaluating Presidential Candidates and incumbent performance as
part of an on-going series of books and papers that are concurrent with their
having engaged Federal Government clients. The idea in this chapter is to
connect the dots among the criteria and considerations that help citizen voters
elect superior candidates to public office. While the example is the Office of
President, the process applies to all elected officials.
The authors became working
colleagues when employed as consultants to Federal Government clients. Dr.
Rodger is a professor of Management Information Systems at Indiana University,
PA and Mr. George was formerly a consultant for ManTech International and
PriceWaterhouseCoopers before becoming an author and independent journalist. As
a journalist, George was retained by CBS News to cover the Affordable
Healthcare Act. He was National Politics Examiner for Examiner.com that is now
Clarity Media.
· Smart Data,
Enterprise Performance Optimization Strategy by James A. George and James A. Rodger © 2010 Wiley Publishing
“Smart Data” modeled the construct for managing information throughout the
secure federal government enterprise and illustrates best practices currently
employed by the US Department of Defense and other Departments and Agencies
under the Federal Enterprise Architecture.
· How to Select
an American President by James A.
George and James A. Rodger © 2017 Archway Publishing
“How to Select” presents a historical understanding about the evolution
political parties and Presidents for the purpose of producing a presidential
candidate resume evaluation process. The president’s job model is defined for
the first time. The book forward is written by a former Member of the US House
of Representatives.
· Regenerating
America with Sustainable Economics ©
2017 by James A. George and James A. Rodger © 2017 Archway Publishing
“Regenerating” demonstrates incongruence between capitalism and democracy, and
suggests a way forward for engineering a sustainable economy. The book is
endorsed by economist Dr. John Ikerd.
· A President’s Manifesto, A model for how presidential candidates can tell
their stories by James A. George © 2019 All Rights Reserved
The author performed an analysis of political party platforms and compared them
with presidential candidate manifestos, and suggests the necessity for
political parties and citizen voters to embrace a more standard approach for
communicating their ideas and intentions.
A note about our work, one of
us is an academic and the other a management consultant, and journalist. Dr.
Rodger is a mathematician and Mr. George has an eclectic academic background
including operations research. Our audience is average American voters because We the People are supposed to be in
charge. The question, is it too hard to be a citizen in a voting democratic
republic?
DISAMBIGUATING THE MEANING OF A “GOOD
AMERICAN PRESIDENT”
Issues, Controversies, Problems
Like many voters in other democratic
societies, American voters are ill-prepared for their responsibility to elect
officials, much less vote on issues and levies. The average American voter
operates with a tenth-grade education, for instance. At no time are students
instructed about how to evaluate elected officials in a manner that is
consistent with the process employed by The Office of Personnel Management
(OPM). As an independent agency, OPM manages the civil service of
the federal government, coordinates recruiting of new government employees,
and manages their health insurance and retirement benefits programs.
“The Senior Executive Service (SES) lead
America’s workforce. As the keystone of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978,
the SES was established to “...ensure that the executive management of the
Government of the United States is responsive to the needs, policies,
and goals of the Nation and otherwise is of the highest quality.” These leaders
possess well-honed executive skills and share a broad perspective on government
and a public service commitment that is grounded in the Constitution.”[6]
Now and never has there been
a Job Application for President of the United States. That’s a glaring
omission.
Issue #1: Standards are ill-defined
and incomplete for evaluating elected officials including the Office of
President of the United States.
Issue #2: Standards such as
suggested in this chapter should result from collaboration and consensus among
political parties and with implications for Constitutional amendments governing
the political process.
Issue #3: Staffing the Executive
branch demands timely and complete action to ensure that all Departments and
Agencies have essential leadership. The process is made slow by incumbent
executives being ill-prepared to staff the government and by the security
clearing process requiring time to complete.
Controversy: Addressing standards
for elected office requires Congressional action and collaboration among
diverse political interests.
Problem: The American Political
System is broken and divided and under attack by foreign adversaries.
Revisiting the objectives:
1.
Demonstrate
how to define what makes a Presidential candidate or incumbent a good one.
The “Introduction” covered much ground in describing what it takes to be
a good president, with a significant omission. That is to consider the entire
Federal Government Enterprise and its complexity. No legitimate
Commander-in-Chief would approach the job as being a “know-it-all genius.” To
lead the nation requires enormous humility and respect for the pluralistic
democracy, the rule of law, and its co-equal partners. Divisiveness does not
serve the electorate well.
When considering a Presidential candidate’s resume, ask for evidence of
where they obtained knowledge associated with the operation of each Department.
U.S. Federal Government Organization Chart
·
Members of the President’s cabinet.
·
Vice President of the United States
·
Speaker of the House
·
President pro tempore of the Senate
·
Secretary of State
·
Secretary of the Treasury
·
Secretary of Defense
·
Attorney General
·
Secretary of the Interior
·
Secretary of Agriculture
·
Secretary of Commerce
·
Secretary of Labor
·
Secretary of Health and Human Services
·
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
·
Secretary of Transportation
·
Secretary of Energy
·
Secretary of Education
·
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
·
Secretary of Homeland Security
1.1 For every Department from which the heads are direct
reports to the President, apply the Presidential Tasks.
1.2 For every Department identify and define how the organization’s
systems and operations serve the nation as reflected in essential outcomes.
1.3 Define the specific Presidential interactions with the
US Congress regarding planning, policy-making, budgeting, implementing laws and
regulations, and proposing changes.
The principal knowledge requirements include Constitutional Law and
Systems Engineering because laws govern all government enterprise operations
and they are implemented in an automated regulatory environment.
Needed is a standard “Application for President of the United States,”
that is consistent with the Office of Personnel Management best practices.
Knowledge, Skill, Experience,
and Proficiency Requirements are derived from the President’s Job Model and from a
thorough consideration of all President’s past performance.
The operating environment of the US Government is one of collaboration
and consensus in a pluralistic structure. The government is a system of
systems, governed by laws and regulations where elected officials should
possess knowledge of the law and knowledge of systems engineering.
Quoting from How to Select an
American President:
“Education
A president of the U. S. A. in the 21st Century should
be expected to have graduated from an accredited college or university with a
Bachelor’s Degree. A Master’s Degree is surely preferred, and a Doctorate would
be highly respected. Should it matter how well the candidate performed in
school? We think so.
Should the quality of the educational institution
matter? We believe that prestige of the college or university on academic merit
matters as it does so in evaluating people in private enterprise. Candidates
that were formerly good students, above average, should matter. Therefore, when
designing the ultimate selection and evaluation tool, we will allow voters to
add extra credit for quality and performance.
Graduating is good but not good enough. What also
matters are the fields of study, the curriculum. In our review of
pre-presidential resumes, we saw that in past times, before colleges and
universities, presidents had very distinguished tutors.
It matters today from whom presidential candidates
studied or mentored. Are their sources of learning and mentoring distinguished
for excellence?
Curriculum
Major Areas of Study
The job of President is Chief Executive of the Federal
Government Enterprise that includes all of its departments and agencies. It is
not reasonable for a presidential candidate to be an expert in every aspect of
the federal government. It is fair to expect candidates to be 1) knowledgeable
about the U. S. Constitution and three branches of government, 2) learned about
management functions and disciplines, and 3) that candidates are knowledgeable
about primary areas of government responsibility such as national defense and
homeland security, justice, foreign policy, health, and human services, energy,
and the environment for instance.
We would be remiss not to identify a relevant subject,
and that is the law itself. Since presidents initiate laws and support
the implementation of rules and regulations and are completely involved in
proposing and approving laws, it makes sense that knowledge about law is most
significant.
Considering academic sources of management knowledge
is only one source from which candidates may obtain understanding as we will
also consider work experience separately.
Did the candidate study with the intent to become a
government professional or did the candidate choose a business or technical
professional goal? Some voters may assign higher value for private sector
orientation than the public sector and vice versa. Our system of evaluation
allows for that type of voter preference variation: public sector or private
sector career orientation.
Another consideration in addition to management
knowledge is technical knowledge. If
the primary aim of a president is to optimize government performance, then this
requires a command of enabling technology that includes information technology
as well as more specific knowledge such as systems engineering, systems
integration, computer science, biotechnology, environmental science, nuclear
science, healthcare, and more specifics.
Foreign
policy and public administration are separate specialized
fields of study that map to presidential needs.
Skills
Managerial skills in a contemporary paradigm include
the following:
o Planning
o Budgeting
o
Strategizing
o Predicting
and forecasting
o Decision
making
o Sensemaking
o Integrating
o
Collaborating and facilitating (aka organizing)
o
Acquisition, logistics, procurement
o Financing
o Safety and
security
(The authors published a
more comprehensive set of management skills in the book, Smart Data,
Enterprise Performance Optimization Strategy © 2010 Wiley Publishing.)
In addition to cognitive learning that is represented
by knowledge requirements and skills as presented, there is another category to
consider called "affective."
Affective
“An attribute
of the human experience that describes feelings or emotions and sometimes
attitudes or values; often used to describe learning objectives or outcomes.”
This is the area of attitude about which Dr. James David Barber talks about as
discussed in the book.
Values
include:
o Allegiance
to the Constitution and laws and regulations
o Loyalty to
party and community
o
Appreciation for diversity and collaboration
o Cherishing
and relishing the opportunity for bipartisan cooperation
Work
History (Sources of applying knowledge,
acquiring new knowledge, and applying and developing skills and proficiency)
Voters should want presidential candidates who have
had work experience of significant scope and scale to illustrate that they can
handle managing the most sophisticated enterprise on Earth.
Private
Sector: Consideration of a candidates work history as it
might appear on a resume is essential whereby the focus is given to
demonstrated advancement and managerial responsibility, especially corporate
executive (C-level) experience. This is the source of applying knowledge
and developing managerial skills. For presidential candidates, voters are
looking for demonstrated success at commanding and leading complex
organizations toward achieving world-class performance. Has the candidate
achieved recognition among peers in the corporate community and public? Has the
candidate demonstrated the ability to make a high return on resources?
Public
Service: Similar consideration is given to
public service. In the instance of evaluating presidential candidates, having
had managerial or CEO experience is significant. Public service includes the
candidate has served in the capacity of Congressman, Senator, or Governor or
Mayor. Having been elected to office is a relevant experience. Having served in
an executive capacity is most valuable. Having served in government provides
the basis for understanding the legislative and budgeting process as that is a
significant role and responsibility.
Military
Service: In the instance of military history
that is a form of public service, we consider the following:
Military
occupation
o Officer,
Non-Commissioned Officer – having graduated from a military institution with
distinction is on par with having been an ROTC graduate from a distinguished
educational institution. Having achieved veteran status is noteworthy of unique
distinction.
o Enlisted,
Drafted, National Guard
o Duration of
service
o Commands
o Wars and
battles
Awards
and Certifications
Public
Service: Has the candidate become an active
leader in a political party? Some past presidents have been independent of
political parties, though today, political parties are a pool from which to
draw for staffing, for instance. With the need for bipartisanship in
government, presidential candidates must manage affiliation with sensitivities
to the voter population and more important constituency. Are parties a means to
an end or are parties the mechanisms for control? Good question for
presidential candidates.
Good issue for voters.
Volunteering:
This may be relevant as an indication of a propensity to serve, and role and
responsibility as a volunteer with impact on accomplishment are noteworthy.
Family: Consideration is given to having overcome
hardships, for instance. Relationships with family members may be insightful.
Community:
Consideration is given to leadership and issues advocacy, for example.
Faith:
We thought about not assigning a value for religious affiliation as relevance
will show up in other factors, and this is private to individuals. Furthermore,
there are alternative sources from which people develop their principles. In
America, to many people, being faithful is significant. Because 60% of
Americans are devoted and guided by religion, special treatment is given to the
topic at the end of this chapter.
Pays
taxes: The presidential candidate is expected to have paid
taxes and not to have any tax liability.
Income and net worth: Income and net worth of a
presidential candidate are relevant as this information is used in obtaining a
top-secret and higher level security clearance. It connotes that the candidate
is financially sound and is less corruptible.
No
legal encumbrance: A presidential candidate cannot have
been a felon and is expected to be without legal impediment. The Emoluments
Clause of the US Constitution applies to ensure no conflicts of interest.
Marital
status: While nearly all Presidents have been married, this
factor is not so relevant except to know about the spouse to the extent that
the spouse will not detract from the Presidency in any way. Throughout history,
the president’s spouses have played significant roles in strengthening
presidents and their performance. Infidelity with a spouse is akin to broken
allegiance. It is a behavioral deficiency worth deliberating.
Incumbency:
Once a candidate becomes a president, that is a steep
hurdle, and no one can underestimate the value of holding the office and
gaining experience from it. As former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R), said in
an interview on WKCL-AM, “To a large extent, no matter what we Republicans do,
an incumbent president either wins or defeats himself.”
Presidential
Health
Voters need to make a judgment about presidential
candidates’ health. They can do it blindly or with the candidates’ cooperation.
The authors advocate the establishment of a procedure
for medical examinations of presidential candidates and reporting the state of
their health.”[7]
Presidential Character
The importance of
presidential character cannot be understated, and there are professional
sources for understanding this including the work of James David Barber, The Presidential Character, 3rd Edition.
Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1985.
“First, a president’s personality is an
important shaper of his presidential behavior on nontrivial matters.
Second, presidential personality is patterned.
His character, world view, and style fit together in a dynamic package
understandable in psychological terms.
Third, a president’s personality interacts
with the power situation he faces and the national “climate of expectations”
dominant at the time he serves.
The tuning, the resonance—or lack of
it—between these external factors and his personality sets in motion the
dynamics of his presidency.
Fourth, the best way to predict a president’s
character, world view, and style is to see how they were put together in the
first place. That happened in his early life, culminating in his first
independent political success.”[8]
Operating Environment
Commonality
All governments have one
thing in common, observes IT guru, Daniel S. Appleton, “They all redistribute
wealth.” No matter what the form of governance and economy, governments and
their leaders make decisions on what and how the wealth of nations will be
spent. They make determinations about their discretion to spend based on
judgments about the elasticity of their decisions.
In the global economy,
trading partners and the aggregate body of global governance determine the
accuracy and truthfulness, and the viability of nation-state decisions. The
aggregate body of governance can be formal organizations and arrangements of
international law and agreements, or it can be informal realized through the
behavior of nation states toward one another in trade and defense policies.
Optimizing the Return on National Resources
Work as described in the
authors’ books, suggests that the ultimate responsibility of governments is to
ensure the optimal return on “national” resources. Observe that it not the same
as “natural resources,” though natural resources are included along with arable
land, materials, capital, people, infrastructure and technology assets. What is
the optimal ratio of population size and demographics to available and
addressable resources? The answer lies deep in the data.
Since humanity on the small
planet Earth is dependent on clean air and water, governments must ensure that
the resources are protected and provided to citizens. Debate about climate
change and the effect of industrialization and overpopulation on the
environment all stem from the necessity to balance economic, social, and environmental
responsibility in triple-bottom-line accounting.
The Chinese government must
weigh the effect of industrial development on the environment just as does the
US government. Hazards to local citizens and the cost of healthcare and the
resulting calamities must be weighed in both the immediate and long-term.
Opportunities for invention
and innovation lies in the pursuit of solutions that stem overpopulation and
guide people to live and prosper in the locations and systems that afford a
good life for them.
Defining a Good Life
From A President’s Manifesto by James A. George © 2019 All Rights
Reserved, Chapter 3: A Good Life for All Citizens for an Entire Lifetime[9]:
“When the nation has a considerable amount of debt and when there is a
revenue shortfall with mounting deficit, those are significant trouble
indications. At the end of the George W. Bush presidential term in 2007,
America was facing a financial collapse.
Financial distress is an extraordinary problem because the nation’s
security and viability are at stake. Nothing is more important than managing to
restore financial integrity because everything else depends upon that.
What are some of the possible causes for a nation’s financial stress?
o
Citizen needs
exceed the government’s capacity to satisfy them.
o
Government
commits to doing more than it has the revenue capacity to achieve.
o
The nation
endures disasters from which resources are insufficient to recover.
o
The nation
embarks on foreign policy that requires military support at a very high cost.
There is a long-standing issue and debate about topics that are aligned
with the causes of financial stress some of which include the following:
o
The existence of
impoverished people in the presence of others who have a good life and much
more.
o
Is it the nation’s
purpose to create an economic environment in which there is a good life for all
of its citizens?
o
What is a “good
life”?
o
Is it national
policy that “poverty” be illegal, or otherwise eliminated for all persons?
o
Are we willing to
ensure equality for all people in the absence of discrimination?
o
Can women be
treated equally at last?
In America today (2019), unemployment is low and the GDP is up as is
the stock market. Wages are increasing at a slow rate. However, government
borrowing and spending results in enormous debt and deficits. How long can
government sustain spending before the bubble bursts again?
A good life means that people are able to work to sustain themselves
and their families, providing adequate food, shelter, clothing and transportation
to get to school and work. They require jobs with upward mobile opportunity to
improve their skill, knowledge, and proficiency to the best of their abilities.
Impoverishment is unacceptable as that inhibits individuals from optimizing
their contribution to society no matter what the form of government and
economy.”
Private Sector and
Corporate Point of View
Corporations in free-market
economies aim to optimize profits. They set aside profit to compensate
executive leadership and talent, and to reserve capital for continuing
improvement, innovation, and invention.
In mixed economies, corporate
performance and behavior is regulated because unmitigated capitalism will
maximize profits while sacrificing social and environmental responsibilities.
The role of government is to create an optimal environment in which they
perform while regulating for the good of the nation-state that is their host
and for the worker citizens.
The political debate in
America is about how much regulation is necessary. It is about the rule of law
operative in a global economy.
Looking at corporations as
systems and considering their interaction with government systems is essential
to corporations optimizing their performance with respect for
triple-bottom-line accounting.
A GOOD AMERICAN PRESIDENT
The challenge is to employ
advanced information technology to map the ontology and to connect the threads
such that information and data are actionable in evaluating presidential
candidates and incumbents.
To arrive at a plausible
answer, the authors created a matrix with three major columns:
1.
Outcomes
2.
Tasks
3.
Performance
Measures and Metrics
Corresponding to outcomes and
tasks is another column called Performance Measures and Metrics. This approach
associates “Outcomes” with “Presidential Tasks” and associated “Metrics.” Some
subtasks are omitted in the chart for brevity.
Table 2. President’s Task Performance, Measures and
Metrics
Outcomes
|
President’s Task Performance
|
Measures & Metrics
|
1.
Human Rights Assured
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance with international agreements and
commitments.
|
100%
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
|
2.
Constitutional/ Bill of Rights Allegiance
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
Subtask 2.1: Assume responsibility for the legacy agenda and make adjustments
to align with the President’s management agenda or equivalent
Subtask 2.2: Work with cabinet heads to develop performance plans and
schedules
Subtask 2.3: Work with Congressional leadership and collaborate to implement
the nation’s strategy, plans, and programs
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
Subtask 3.1: Propose bills to Congress
Subtask 3.2: Consult and advise Congress
Subtask 3.3: Collaborate with industry and business leaders in the
development of policies and regulations of all kinds
Subtask 3.4: Approve or veto legislation
Subtask 3.5: Request a declaration for war from Congress
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
Subtask 4.1: Review and evaluate programs that include new acquisitions and
on-going operations
Subtask 4.2: Evaluate programs including legacy processes and engineer new
ones for accomplishing and producing required and promised outcomes
Subtask 4.3: Continuously improve
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
100%
The US Department of
Justice Strategic Plan is out of date and noncompliant.
The US President has allegedly obstructed justice and awaits Congressional
action.
The US President dishonors
subpoenas from Congress by directing that they be ignored by the Executive
branch.
|
3. Rule of
Law Followed
|
President’s actions
such as Executive Orders comply with the law.
|
100%
Measures: Court Findings for and against the President.
The US Department of Justice Strategic Plan is out of date and noncompliant.
Many of President Trump’s EOs have been stricken by the court as being
illegal and unenforceable.
|
4.
Economic Security
|
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
Subtask 3.1: Propose bills to Congress
Subtask 3.2: Consult and advise Congress
Subtask 3.3: Collaborate with industry and
business leaders in the development of policies and regulations of all kinds
Subtask 3.4: Approve or veto legislation
Subtask 3.5: Request a declaration for war
from Congress
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
Subtask 4.1: Review and evaluate programs
that include new acquisitions and on-going operations
Subtask 4.2: Evaluate programs including
legacy processes and engineer new ones for accomplishing and producing
required and promised outcomes
Subtask 4.3: Continuously improve
|
100%
Measures and Metrics
Correspond with all appropriate Departments and Agencies plans, programs, and
budgets.
Budget Request/Annual Performance
Plan and Reports
“The Government Performance and
Results Act Modernization Act (GPRAMA) of 2010 requires Treasury
and other federal agencies to formally monitor and review organizational
performance through strategic reviews, the annual performance plan, and the
annual performance report.”
“The Congressional Justification of Appropriations (CJ) reflects the
President’s Budget request for the Department of the Treasury and is prepared
in accordance with OMB Circular A-11. The CJ includes agency priorities,
requested budget levels, and performance plans and reports (in accordance
with GPRAMA).”[10]
|
5.
Sustainable Economy
|
Task 2: Develop the
President’s management agenda and budget and reconcile with Congress
Subtask
2.1: Assume responsibility for the legacy agenda and make adjustments to
align with the President’s management agenda or equivalent
Subtask
2.2: Work with cabinet heads to develop performance plans and schedules
Subtask
2.3: Work with Congressional leadership and collaborate to implement the
nation’s strategy, plans, and programs
Evidence
of specific agenda and compliance with international agreements and
commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and
approve legislation
(Subtasks
omitted)
Evidence
of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in specific
measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans
and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks
omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
100%
Measures and Metrics Correspond with all appropriate
Departments and Agencies plans, programs, and budgets.
There is no requirement for a sustainable economy.
|
6.
Environmental Security
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
100%
Clean Air and Clean Water
“Planning, Budget, and
Results
EPA’s planning, budget, and
results activities enable EPA to carry out its mission through:
·
coordinating
EPA planning efforts and preparing EPA’s Strategic Plan;
·
developing and
managing EPA’s budget; and
·
reporting on
EPA’s financial and performance results.”[11]
“The Clean
Water Act (CWA) establishes the basic structure for regulating
discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating
quality standards for surface waters. ... Under the CWA, EPA has implemented
pollution control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry.
Mar 11, 2019”
“The Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. § 7401) is a United States federal law designed to control air pollution on a national
level. ... The first federal legislation to actually pertain to
"controlling" air pollution was the Clean Air
Act of 1963.”
|
7.
National Military Security
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
100%
Measures and Metrics Correspond with all appropriate
Departments and Agencies plans, programs, and budgets.
Observe that the GAO
evaluates GPRA implementation by department and agency and issues a report.
“Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed
the Department of Defense's (DOD) implementation of the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA).
GAO noted that: (1) the implementation of GPRA
within DOD is in its initial stages and many implementation strategies and
key approaches need to be developed, but DOD has made progress at various
organizational levels in implementing GPRA or strategic planning and
performance measurement initiatives consistent with GPRA; (2) DOD has
developed strategic goals and objectives and is refining a set of performance
measures to meet the planning requirements of GPRA; (3) some subordinate DOD
organizations, building on their experience as GPRA pilots, are developing or
improving strategic planning and performance measurement systems; some other
defense organizations are developing or improving such systems as well; (4)
GAO's work suggests and DOD officials agree that DOD's effectiveness in
implementing the requirements of GPRA may be improved by better hierarchical
linking of goals and performance measures; (5) for example, GAO recently
examined the degree to which DOD's logistics strategic plan provides an integrated
logistics roadmap for the department to support its warfighting strategy; (6)
while the services' strategic plans and initiatives generally support
implementation of the DOD plan, their goals, objectives, and strategies are
not always directly linked; (7) DOD indicated that it will ensure that the
next edition of the DOD Logistics Strategic Plan includes specific guidance
to require the services to link their goals to DOD's; (8) this is important
because, without this goal alignment, DOD may have difficulty meeting its
department-wide logistics goals, which are to reduce logistics response time,
develop a seamless logistics system, and streamline the logistics
infrastructure; (9) GAO's recent work also found that DOD's strategic
information resources planning effort does not appear to link its information
resources management systems development with recent initiatives
focusing on consolidating or privatizing various areas of logistics
operations; (10) if not linked, DOD could end up spending millions of dollars
on systems designed to support functions that it might not plan to do or in
organizations that might be eliminated; (11) DOD stated that it is addressing
these concerns by preparing a new logistics business systems strategy; (12)
GAO's review of DOD's ongoing GPRA implementation efforts suggests that
hierarchically linked goals and measures will be crucial for success; (13)
DOD must ensure the services implement GPRA at their level and provide goals
that link DOD's department strategic goals with those of lower level
components; and (14) some of the officials assigned GPRA liaison
responsibilities told GAO they did not know what, if anything, they should be
doing to promote GPRA principles within their organizations.”[12]
|
8.
Education
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
|
9.
Homeland
Secured
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
Subtask 2.1: Assume responsibility for the
legacy agenda and make adjustments to align with the President’s management
agenda or equivalent
Subtask 2.2: Work with cabinet heads to
develop performance plans and schedules
Subtask 2.3: Work with Congressional
leadership and collaborate to implement the nation’s strategy, plans, and
programs
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
100%
|
10.
Full Employment
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
100%
|
11.
Upward Workforce Mobility
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in specific
measurable outcomes.
|
|
12.
All Citizens minimally sustained
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
No Poverty
|
13.
Social Security for all Disabled and Retired
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
|
14.
Free Nation
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measurable outcomes.
|
|
15.
Low Crime
|
Task 2: Develop the President’s management agenda and budget and
reconcile with Congress
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific agenda and compliance
with international agreements and commitments.
Task 3: Initiate and approve legislation
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs,
initiatives and orders resulting in specific measurable outcomes.
Task 4: Implement plans and manage on-going operations
(Subtasks omitted)
Evidence of specific plans, programs, initiatives and orders resulting in
specific measureable outcomes.
|
|
A President is responsible for on-going government services, systems,
and operations as legislated and funded by Congress. Therefore, the first act
is to manage the bureaucracy to deliver the required services to the
satisfaction of Congress and Citizen Users.
Second, a President may propose changes and improvements, including
retiring systems and services. However, that is subject to Congressional
approval.
The question is, how does the US government measure the performance of
Departments and Agencies that are responsible for services delivery? Since the
President leads the Executive branch in staffing all of the departments and
agencies, one of the essential tasks is staffing.
Table 3. President’s Task Performance, Measures and
Metrics, Government Services Delivered
16. Government
Services Delivered
|
Task 1: Planning, staffing,
organizing, and scheduling Presidential work and government functions
Subtask
1.1: Recruit and staff the cabinet and department and agency appointments
Subtask
1.2: Conduct cabinet meetings to develop and implement strategies and
policies for accomplishing the nation’s workload and issues
Subtask 1.3: Define the nation’s outcomes and priorities for each
major department and agency to produce the nation’s strategic plan
|
100%
As legislated and
required by law.
Performance is
measured by each department and agency in accordance with Congressional
Oversight and Executive Branch scrutiny.
|
Figure 1. The Government of the United
States
2.
Describe
the necessity for political parties and other third-party organizations to help
voters vet candidates.
As non-profit corporation political parties should be accountable and
liable for vetting candidates and incumbents bearing their brand. However, the
judiciary may not agree.
“Update: A federal judge dismissed the DNC
lawsuit on August 28. The
court recognized that the DNC treated voters unfairly, but ruled that the DNC
is a private corporation; therefore, voters cannot protect their
rights by turning to the courts:
“To the extent Plaintiffs
wish to air their general grievances with the DNC or its candidate selection
process, their redress is through the ballot box, the DNC’s internal workings,
or their right of free speech — not through the judiciary.”[13]
Let
the voters beware.
Citizens
may not have the time, skill, or knowledge to properly vet candidate resumes.
They are dependent on political parties, and other third-parties for
assistance. Needed are technology inventions such as apps to help them manage
the data and to answer question.
The
League of Women Voters is one example of a third-party source of candidate
information.
“Elections
We are all equal at the ballot box, but only if we vote. We engage
millions of voters every year ensuring Americans have the information
they need to participate in elections that determine our future.”[14]
3.
Discuss
the nature of competence and character in evaluating prospective candidates and
incumbents.
Managing the large and complex US Federal Government Enterprise requires
collaboration and consensus among three co-equal branches of government. The
President must possess leadership and behavioral traits for achieving results
in a bipartisan environment.
Being a CEO of a private corporation is considerably different from
being a US President because the aim is not profit-driven, and the relationship
between the chief executive and the other branches of government is dissimilar
to that of the relationship with a Board of Directors.
In some sense, Citizens are considered shareholders in the US Government
because they pay for it with their taxes, and they elect leadership and
representatives. Citizens receive a return on their investment as realized in
services and outcomes.
Citizens expect and demand loyalty from the President to the rule of
law, the US Constitution, and executing the Oath of Office with high integrity.
Lying by a federal government official is against the law and therefore a
President must guard their words as being honest and truthful. Contradictory is
the fact that a sitting President cannot be prosecuted for crimes, and can only
be impeached by Congress.
SOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The order of complexity
inherent in a democratic republic and its associated Federal Government
Enterprise is enormous. However, with the aid of technology and improved
systems and tools, citizen voters can improve their choices and decision
making.
The greatest challenge is to
inspire elected officials to redouble their focus and attention to the
priorities and essentials of good governance. The President is the leader in
ensuring a good life for all citizens.
The specific issues and needs
change in response to the global environment. America is a member of the global
community from which isolation is not an option. A President must apply
collaboration skills broadly in conducting foreign policy and to secure the
nation and to contribute to global peace, prosperity, and security.
Political science, law,
economics, and systems engineering intersect as disciplines for continuous
improvement and that is what the authors wish to bring to light.
The overarching legislation
governing performance management in the Federal government is The GPRA
Modernization Act of 2010.
“The GPRA Modernization Act modernizes the Federal Government’s
performance management framework, retaining and amplifying some aspects of the
Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA 1993) while also
addressing some of its weaknesses. GPRA 1993 established strategic planning,
performance planning and performance reporting as a framework for agencies to
communicate progress in achieving their missions. The GPRA Modernization Act establishes
some important changes to existing requirements.
The purposes of the GPRA Modernization Act are to:
o
Improve the
confidence of the American people in the capability of the Federal
Government, by systematically holding Federal agencies accountable for
achieving program results;
o
Improve program
performance by requiring agencies to set goals, measure performance against
those goals and report publicly on progress;
o
Improve Federal
program effectiveness and public accountability by promoting a focus on
results, service quality and customer satisfaction;
o
Help Federal
managers improve service delivery, by requiring that they plan for meeting
program goals and by providing them with information about program results and
service quality;
o
Improve congressional
decision-making by providing more information on achieving statutory objectives
and on the relative effectiveness and efficiency of
Federal programs and spending;
o
Improve internal
management of the Federal Government; and
o
Improve
usefulness of performance and program information by modernizing public
reporting”[15]
The question today (2019), is
the Executive Branch under incumbent Donald Trump, following the law? Is
Congress enforcing the law with oversight?
FUTURE
RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
Because democracy and its
institutions are intended to be accessible and addressable to average citizens,
it is essential to develop education curricula and tools, including software
applications that help voters increase their engagement and interaction in government
processes. Herein lies much opportunity to break new ground with inventions and
innovations.
The authors suggest
establishing standards for political party platforms and for Presidential
candidates for mapping their manifestos to the platforms. Also recommended is
creating an “app” to assist citizen voters in evaluating candidate resumes and
credentials.
Conclusion
This
chapter raises more questions though has begun to answer many to initiate
further research and actions by citizens, political parties, and the media to
help ensure that the democratic republic will endure against threats to
equality and freedom. Perhaps the most significant risk is from complacency and
cynicism. Democracy is a living institution and is adaptive to change and
improvement. It depends on intellectual investment for its survival and
capacity to thrive.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research received no
specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or
not-for-profit sectors.
REFERENCES
James A. George and
James A. Rodger, How to Select an
American President © 2017 Archway Publishing
James A. George and
James A. Rodger, Regenerating America
with Sustainable Economics © 2017 Archway Publishing
James A. George and
James A. Rodger, Smart Data, Enterprise
Performance Optimization Strategy © 2010 Wiley Publishing
James A. Rodger and
James A. George, Triple bottom line
accounting for optimizing natural gas sustainability: A statistical linear
programming fuzzy ILOWA optimized sustainment model approach to reducing supply
chain global cybersecurity vulnerability through information and communications
technology, Journal of Cleaner Production,
2017
US Constitution and The Bill of Rights
James David Barber, The Presidential Character: Predicting
Performance in the White House 4th Edition – Ebook, ISBN 13: ISBN:
9781138459915
James A. George, A President’s Manifesto © 2019 All
Rights Reserved. The eBook is made free from the author on email request.
KEY
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Collaboration:
Working
together to create something that is better than going it alone. In a democratic
republic, representatives from different political parties collaborate to
attend to the needs of the nation, where getting things done in a bipartisan
manner is more important than political ideology.
Concept of Operations (CONOPS):
The
concept of operations (CONOPS) of the American Political System begins with the
US Constitution. Though there is also the notion of political parties and their
role in offering ideological brands based on or relating to a system of ideas
and ideals, especially concerning economic or political theory and policy.
The
extent to which party brands align with what the “Framers” had in mind is open
for debate.
Formal Concept Analysis (FCA):
“FCA
is an applied branch of Lattice Theory, a mathematical discipline which enables
formalization of concepts as basic units of human thinking and analyzing data
in the object-attribute form. Originated in early 80s, during the last three
decades, it became a popular human-centered tool for knowledge representation
and data analysis with numerous applications.”[16]
Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI):
“The GPI measures the improvement in economic welfare – costs
associated with growth. It is measured using the formula:
GPI = A + B – C – D + I
A is income weighted private consumption
B is value of non-market services generating welfare
C is private defensive cost of natural deterioration
D is cost of deterioration of nature and natural resources
I is an increase in capital stock and balance of international trade
The GPI takes a wider measure of economic indicators into
consideration. For example, GPI includes
value of voluntary work and unpaid work.
value of leisure time
Distribution of income
Impact on environment
Environmental standards
Gross Domestic Product (GDP):
Tim
Allen, International Monetary Fund defines it this way:
“Theoretically, GDP can be viewed in three different ways:
● The production approach sums the “value-added” at each
stage of production, where value-added is defined as total sales less the value
of intermediate inputs into the production process. For example, flour would be
an intermediate input and bread the final product; or an architect’s services
would be an intermediate input and the building the final product.
● The expenditure approach adds up the value of purchases
made by final users—for example, the consumption of food, televisions, and
medical services by households; the investments in machinery by companies; and
the purchases of goods and services by the government and foreigners.
● The income approach sums the incomes generated by
production—for example, the compensation employees receive and the operating
surplus of companies (roughly sales less costs).”
When GDP is growing that is a
good thing.
“GDP measures the monetary value of
final goods and services—that is, those that are bought by the final
user—produced in a country in a given period of time (say a quarter or a year).
It counts all of the output generated within the borders of a country. GDP is
composed of goods and services produced for sale in the market and also
includes some nonmarket production, such as defense or education
services provided by the government.”[18]
Group Knowledge Model:
In
this chapter, group knowledge model refers to the process of information about
the subject to socialize the discussion and to enhance individual
understanding.
Job Model:
A
job model is a technique for defining the work performed from a specific
position in an organization. The author learned the approach while being
employed by AT&T and found it compatible with process modeling techniques
such as the Integrated Definition Language (IDEF) employed extensively by the
US Department of Defense and other departments and agencies.
Work
is defined as tasks and subtasks that are akin to activities and arrayed in a
logical hierarchy.
National Resources:
National
resources include natural resources.
“Natural resources are natural assets (raw materials) occurring in
nature that can be used for economic production or consumption.”[19]
National
resources include capital and human capital and infrastructure as well as the
government enterprise and all its assets.
Operating Environment:
In
computer technology terms, an operating environment or integrated
applications environment is the environment in which users
run application software.
In
this chapter, the operating environment encompasses all of the processes and
systems as legislated and funded by Congress and managed by the Executive
branch under oversight from Congress. The technical infrastructure is computer
and communications technology.
Optimize:
To
optimize in this chapter means making the highest yield and best use of
government resources in the process of attending citizen needs. Optimizing
requires trade-offs and deliberate consideration for risks and benefits toward
producing required outcomes and associated metrics.
Optimized Sustainment Model (OSM):
The authors proposed the Optimized Sustainment Model in the book,
Regenerating America with Sustainable Economics by James A. George and James A.
Rodger © 2017 Archway Publishing. The idea is to develop business rules and
regulations that support the application of triple-bottom-line accounting
methods to measuring corporate performance. The idea is to balance rewards for
economic, social, and environmental responsibility. It is a work in progress
for which academics are encouraged to contribute.
The model is suggested as an alternative to capitalism.
Pluralistic Democracy:
In
the American Political System, pluralism describes the three equal branches of
government: Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary.
“Americans believed, almost from the beginning, that pluralism and
democracy were compatible, even mutually enhancing. At first, to be sure,
it was only religious pluralism that was valued; ethnicity and race came later
(and not easily), but religion is the crucial issue today. The greatest threat
to pluralism and democracy in the contemporary world is the belief
that virtuous government requires religious homogeneity and clerical
dominance: a single faith and a single version of God’s law.”[20]
“Pluralism is a theory of the distribution of political power
that holds that power is widely and evenly dispersed in society, rather than
concentrated in the hands of an elite or ruling class.”[21]
Political Engineering:
There
is a plethora of sources that define “political engineering.” The authors
appreciate the definition posted on Political Science, Author Pooja, “What are
the main Objectives of Political Engineering?” Stated as objectives:
“The objectives of ‘political engineering’ would be:
(a) To formulate, develop and operationalize the concept of ‘political
technology’ suitable to meet the needs and demands of the democratic systems;
(b) To identify political technologies out of experiences gathered by
the political leaders during the last five decades of democracy;
(c) To process and update these identified political technologies
(IPTs) for use to strengthen, defend and protect the democratic system;
(d) To relate particular political technologies to some specific
problems areas so as to empower democratic politicians to be more effective for
delivering goods to the people; and
(e) To make these ‘political technologies’ available to the people.”[22]
Private Sector:
The
part of the national economy that is not under direct government control,
though for which corporations and citizens are regulated.
Public Sector:
The
part of an economy that is controlled by the government and funded by taxpaying
citizens who control the government.
Service-oriented Enterprise:
From the perspective of this chapter, the Federal
Government and all of its departments and agencies are service delivering
enterprises, based on a service-oriented enterprise architecture.
The technical, information technology description: The
Service Oriented Enterprise (SOE) is now a mature model (since 2005) for
architecting software and I.T. infrastructure. “It works in concert with
current platform architectures as well as enables next generation
process-driven architectures. At its heart, the SOE employs the use of a
Service Network in order to achieve certain objectives. The Service
Network introduces the concept of interface ubiquity, which enables the same
base communication mechanisms to be used within an application as is used
between applications as well as between trading partners.”
Word-Sense Disambiguation (WSD):
"Lexical disambiguation, in its broadest definition is nothing
less than determining the meaning of every word in context, which appears to be
largely unconscious in people."[23]
Dr.
James Rodger is researching how to develop applications to assist
citizen-voters and that led to the question, what is a “good American
President?” This chapter is diligence in understanding the context.
ENDNOTES
[5] HILTON HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY STATEMENT
- ir.hilton.com. https://ir.hilton.com/~/media/Files/H/Hilton-Worldwide-IR-V3/committee-composition/he-human-rights-policy-2017.pdf
[7] James A. George, How to Select an American President.
https://howtoselectanamericanpresident.blogspot.com/
[8] The Presidential Character -
bxscience.edu. https://bxscience.edu/ourpages/auto/2013/2/1/51085783/barber_presidential_character_4types.pdf
[9] James A. George, A President’s Manifesto © 2019 All Rights Reserved, Chapter 3: A
Good Life for All Citizens for an Entire Lifetime
[10] US Treasury, Budget Request/Annual Performance Plan and Reports,
[16] Dmitry I. Ignatov, Introduction to Formal Concept Analysis and Its Applications in
Information Retrieval and Related Fields, Cornell University,
[1703.02819] Introduction to Formal Concept Analysis and ....
https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02819
[17] Genuine Progress Indicator GPI v GDP
| Economics Help.
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/2666/economics/genuine-progress-indicator-gpi-v-gdp/
[18] Finance & Development -
International Monetary Fund.
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/gdp.htm
[19] Glossary of Environment Statistics,
Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, United Nations, New York, 1997.